BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors Co. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to BorgWarner, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.15% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.85, signalling downside risk potential of -23.54%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.17 which suggests that it could grow by 17.97%. Given that General Motors Co. has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, Inc., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than BorgWarner, Inc..

BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.689% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.25%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. BorgWarner, Inc. pays 29.26% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of $173M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, BorgWarner, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 105.91x while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 26.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner, Inc. is 1.02x versus 0.42x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing Co. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to BorgWarner, Inc.'s net margin of -5.81%. BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.15% beat Modine Manufacturing Co.'s return on equity of 10%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.85, signalling downside risk potential of -23.54%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $249.17 which suggests that it could grow by 13.52%. Given that Modine Manufacturing Co. has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, Inc., analysts believe Modine Manufacturing Co. is more attractive than BorgWarner, Inc..

BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.689% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing Co. has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.685%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Modine Manufacturing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner, Inc. pays 29.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing Co. quarterly revenues of $805M. BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of $173M is higher than Modine Manufacturing Co.'s net income of -$46.8M. Notably, BorgWarner, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 105.91x while Modine Manufacturing Co.'s PE ratio is 121.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner, Inc. is 1.02x versus 4.09x for Modine Manufacturing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to BorgWarner, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.15% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.85, signalling downside risk potential of -23.54%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $418.44 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that BorgWarner, Inc. has more downside risk than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than BorgWarner, Inc..

BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.689% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner, Inc. pays 29.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of $173M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, BorgWarner, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 105.91x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 398.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner, Inc. is 1.02x versus 15.93x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.